How Much is Bitacle Biting?
Wow, this is even more interesting from my previous post, I followed a trackback from the blog Logic& Emotion, and was taken to Bitacle. This time it was a Bitacle search result where it had the person’s full blog entry, access to other entries and ads all over.


I DO smell a lawsuit coming. I know this one is under the creative commons license, but does that license give them the right to take bloggers’ content and make money off of it without any deal or mention?
Sure, there’s a link back to the person’s entry, but as they say “Why by the cow, when the milk is for free“? Hell, you can even leave a comment there. Now there is NO reason for a person to visit your blog. Does anyone else know what’s going on? Kevin, let us know when the Netvibes CEO has gotten back to you. Kevin has also noticed Bitacle’s Blogger Spam, but have you investigated where it’s taken you?
Technorati Tags: bitacle, netvibes, creativecommons
September 22nd, 2006 at 5:43 am
[…] « How Much is Bitacle Biting? […]
September 22nd, 2006 at 6:13 am
[…] Reference posts: How much is Bitacle Biting? and …the Bitacle Saga Continues […]
September 22nd, 2006 at 3:17 pm
[…] Miren la diferencia entre los posts en Inglés que hablan de Bitacle y lo que dicen los blogs en español; para darles una idea. Owen Winkler pide ayuda para frenarlos por sploggers y escribió un plugin muy bueno [miren el resultado de ese plugin]; Shel Israel tambien se queja de como “ponen publicidad EN mi contenido aún cuando no uso CC“; Monkey Notions piensa en un juicio contra ellos; los primeros 10 resultados de google son dolorosos y Spoken For los llama bastardos directamente. […]
September 22nd, 2006 at 8:40 pm
I don’t see any Creative Commons licenses or any copyright statements at all on the source blog — was it removed? Am I missing something obvious? IANAL, but by default if the author doesn’t say anything else you have to assume all rights are reserved other than “fair use” rights — which Bitacle is going WAY beyond.
(Some of the many Creative Commons licenses might actually allow this re-use; depends on the license. Others definitely wouldn’t, such as BY-NC-SA. Not that Bitacle would likely care either way.)
September 22nd, 2006 at 10:13 pm
E-mail:
Bitacle es un lector de rss, atom via web.
Como puede ser para correo electrónico via web hotmail, gmail, etc.
Existen el mercado multitud de lectores ya sea por web o a través del sistema operativo que usted utilice.
La licencia solamente se aplica a nuestro sitio para nuestra programación, pero el contenido de la información y la licencia que usted aplique es suya.
Usted debe de controlar los contenidos que suministra a un lector de blogs y el tráfico que recibe de ellos, nadie le obliga a sindicar contenidos.
Atentamente bitacle.
September 23rd, 2006 at 4:03 am
John: If you go to Bitacle’s Main Pageat the bottom in the footer, you’ll see a link that says CC licensing.
Augustin: Interesting comment when I put it in Google Translate. I’d love to have a dialog with you if you have a link /blog/ contact info.
September 23rd, 2006 at 1:18 pm
Just in case the google translation messed up something.. “E-mail:
Bitacle is an rss/atom web reader.
As you can read emails in hotmail, gmail, etc.
Theres a lot of RSS Readers in the market, via web or the OS of your choice
Our license only applies for the programming, but the content of the information and the license you apply is yours
Its up to you to control the contents you supply to ablog reader and the traffic you get from them. No one forces you to sindicate content
Yours truly
Bitacle”
How can they respond in that way??
September 23rd, 2006 at 2:36 pm
[…] Pero peor aún en una respuesta estándar que están enviando a todos los blogs que se quejaron dicen textualmente: Bitacle es un lector de rss, atom via web…. Como puede ser para correo electrónico via web hotmail, gmail, etc. […]
September 23rd, 2006 at 3:25 pm
That’s the same exact response I got when I emailed bitacle@gmail.com (sure hope a spammer catches that!). When I protested again, the basic answer I got was “tough frijoles.” Why should they care, they’re making a bundle off of other people’s writing? Unless my blog host, their ISP, or Google shuts them out, the only solution seems to be feeding excerpts so that readers have to go to the original blog. Might be slightly annoying for readers but it’s no fun for me if they read from an aggregator and never comment. If I lose a few lurkers, so be it.
September 23rd, 2006 at 9:39 pm
[…] monkeynotions.com/blog/…how-much-is-bitacle-biting/ […]
September 24th, 2006 at 6:28 am
[…] Monkey Notions: How Much is Bitacle Biting? […]
September 27th, 2006 at 11:45 am
Bitacle = thief
Ladrones!! Ladrones!!!
September 27th, 2006 at 7:35 pm
I wrote about this back in March, 2006 and I can assure you that they DON’T care about the Creative Commons license, such as the one we’re using.
Their bot is also “dirty” as it doesn’t obey the “robots.txt” standard and the only way we could stop them is by blocking them via htaccess.
January 24th, 2007 at 2:35 pm
Nice Post.
That was well said. Always appreciate your indepth views. Keep up the great work!
John
January 31st, 2007 at 5:35 pm
Wow. Thanks for such a great post!
February 1st, 2007 at 1:53 pm
You guys rock. Keep doing it!
February 1st, 2007 at 3:42 pm
Loved Your Blog. Very nice. Hope you keep adding more!